- Out of Office: The Huddle
- Posts
- Why Clear Expectations Die In Implicit Conversations
Why Clear Expectations Die In Implicit Conversations

There are two ways people communicate expectations at work.
Implicit.
Explicit.
Both will piss people off at some point. One just wastes significantly more time.
Implicit communication relies on hints, tone, context, and shared assumptions. It sounds like, “Just use your judgment,” or “We’re all adults here,” or “I thought it was obvious.”
Nothing is actually said. Everything is implied.
Explicit communication names the expectation directly. What’s required. What good looks like. What needs to change. With no guessing required.
The average person will default to implicit communication because instead of optimizing for progress, they optimize for comfort.
That comfort shows up in two ways:
It minimizes the perceived risk of hurting someone’s feelings or creating relational tension.
And it avoids the work of slowing down, clarifying thoughts, and packaging expectations in a way that actually solves the problem.
In other words, it protects everyone from momentary discomfort—at the cost of long-term clarity.
The problem is that implicit communication doesn’t prevent tension. It just delays it. And when it finally surfaces, it’s usually messier because expectations were never clearly stated to begin with.
Which leads to confusion, unnecessary back-and-forth, and resentment that builds quietly while everyone pretends things are fine.
This is where most people get stuck, because they’ve never actually defined what a successful conversation looks like.
For many, unconsciously, a successful conversation is one where:
1.) Nobody felt uncomfortable
2.) No tension showed up
3.) Everyone walked away feeling “fine”
But that definition guarantees failure.
A more useful definition is this:
A conversation is successful when expectations are clear and there is forward movement—regardless of whether the moment felt comfortable.
Nobody enjoys uncomfortable conversations, especially around necessary behavior change. But what’s worse: one uncomfortable conversation done well, or the same conversation repeated five times because it was never clear the first time?
Once you adopt that new definition, the rule becomes obvious:
If it matters, it must be explicit.
Here’s what that looks like in practice.
Implicit sounds like: “Let me know if you need anything.”
Explicit sounds like: “I expect a draft by Thursday at noon. If that’s not realistic, tell me today.”
Implicit sounds like: “This didn’t quite land.”
Explicit sounds like: “This missed the mark because X. Here’s what needs to change.”
Implicit creates interpretation.
Explicit creates a target.
If you’re worried about being “too direct,” ask yourself this instead:
Am I being unclear to protect their feelings or to protect myself from discomfort?
Because people can’t meet expectations they can’t see.
And they can’t correct what was never clearly named.
Being clear isn’t harsh, it’s respectful.
It tells people where they stand, what’s required, and how to succeed.
So if something matters, say it plainly.
If the expectation is important, name it.
And if the conversation feels uncomfortable, that doesn’t mean it failed.
It usually means it finally worked.